jane_fonda (director)
literal strings: Jane Fonda, jane fonda, jane_fonda, jane-fonda
Help NELL Learn!
NELL wants to know if these beliefs are correct.
If they are or ever were, click thumbs-up. Otherwise, click thumbs-down.
categories
- director(100.0%)
- CMC @1103 (100.0%) on 08-mar-2018 [ PREFIX=ja 5.73755 SUFFIX=nda 1.70399 SUFFIX=da 1.34087 FULL_WORDSHAPE=a_a 1.23437 SUFFIX=ne 1.18384 FULL_POS=NN_NN 1.17611 LASTPREFIX=fo 1.17095 POS=NN -0.66334 CHARS -2.22688 WORDS -2.76796 ] using jane_fonda
- SEAL @841 (55.8%) on 25-may-2014 [ 1 2 ] using jane_fonda
- personaustralia(100.0%)
- CMC @1104 (100.0%) on 18-mar-2018 [ PREFIX=ja 4.93282 SUFFIX=ane 2.39107 FULL_WORDSHAPE=a_a 2.09424 SUFFIX=ne 2.01521 SUFFIX=nda 1.88539 WORDSHAPE=aaaaa 1.40585 SHORT_WORDSHAPE=Aa 1.17404 PREFIX=fo -1.24557 CHARS -2.96644 WORDS -7.79093 ] using jane_fonda
- SEAL @338 (50.0%) on 08-jul-2011 [ 1 ] using jane_fonda
relations
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
- hassibling
- george
- CPL @1107 (50.0%) on 24-may-2018 [ "arg1 was jealous of arg2" ] using (jane_fonda, george)
- CPL @1107 (50.0%) on 24-may-2018 [ "arg1 was jealous of arg2" ] using (george, jane_fonda)
- hasspouse
- ted_turner
- SEAL @574 (87.5%) on 21-may-2012 [ 1 2 3 ] using (jane_fonda, ted_turner)
- SEAL @574 (87.5%) on 21-may-2012 [ 1 2 3 ] using (ted_turner, jane_fonda)
- tom_hayden
- CPL @1109 (50.0%) on 12-jun-2018 [ "arg1 and her then husband arg2" ] using (tom_hayden, jane_fonda)
- CPL @1109 (50.0%) on 12-jun-2018 [ "arg1 and her then husband arg2" ] using (jane_fonda, tom_hayden)
- turner
- CPL @1104 (75.0%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was once married to arg1" "arg2 married the actress arg1" ] using (turner, jane_fonda)
- CPL @1104 (75.0%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was once married to arg1" "arg2 married the actress arg1" ] using (jane_fonda, turner)
- wifeof
- turner
- CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and his wife arg2" "arg1 and wife arg2" "arg1 was once married to arg2" "arg1 married the actress arg2" ] using (turner, jane_fonda)
