CPL @1095 (97.5%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "_ also affirmed the district court" "_ analyzed whether" "_ granted the application" "_ affirmed the holding" "_ affirmed the Commission" "_ has not ruled on" "_ has the jurisdiction" "_ recently granted certiorari" "_ reinstated the case" "case is heard in _" "_ dismissed the appeal" "_ correctly applied the law" "_ affirmed a summary judgment" "_ affirmed the summary judgment" "_ was not persuaded by" "_ plainly erred in" "_ vacated the District Court" "_ recently heard a case" "federal courts of _" "_ ordered the government" "_ issued a D-D decision" "_ has upheld the constitutionality" "_ stayed the execution" "_ sitting en" "_ vacated the judgment" "_ affirmed the trial court decision" "Circuit court of _" "_ dismissed the plaintiff" "_ also hears cases" "_ denied this petition" "ninth circuit court of _" "sole jurisdiction of _" "_ affirmed petitioner" "_ affirmed a lower court" "_ found the statute" "_ established the Office" "case was sent to _" "_ vacated the injunction" "_ affirmed the district court decision" "_ dismissed a case" "_ acted within" "_ was clearly erroneous" "_ has never ruled on" "_ denied the city" "_ denied the employer" "_ then considered whether" "_ reversed the trial court’s decision" "_ ruled last June" "_ certified the case" "_ has upheld a ruling" "_ found the facts" "_ therefore erred in" "_ strikes down" "_ overturned the decision" "_ conducted a hearing" "_ also remanded the case" "_ affirmed the sentence" "_ is the intermediate appellate court" "_ has not spoken on" "_ held unconstitutional" "matter is remanded to _" "_ ordered a retrial" "_ rejected the appeals" "circuit court of _" "_ appointed counsel" "_ granted the City" "_ denied the plaintiff" "_ vacated the order" "_ reversed a lower court decision" "_ rejected plaintiff" "_ overturned that decision" "_ ordered the company" "_ recently issued a ruling" "_ made a ruling" "_ later ruled in" "_ granted a new trial" "_ affirmed the lower court ruling" "_ affirmed the convictions" "_ found infringement" "_ dismissed the petition" "_ did not reach the merits" "_ issued an Order" "_ finally ruled in" "_ hear cases" "_ rejected the taxpayer" "_ dismissed the suit" "_ accepted the argument" "_ denied a request" "_ denied certiorari" "_ decides this case" "_ rejected an argument" "_ rejected petitioners" "_ reversed the jury verdict" "_ reversed the Court" "_ reasoned in" "_ issued the writ" "_ overturned the death sentence" "_ issued a mandate" "_ rejected the argument" "_ upheld the authority" "_ held that section" "_ held the district court" "_ reviewed the record" "_ reached a different conclusion" "_ affirming the decision" "_ also considered whether" "_ reversed the circuit court" "_ loses jurisdiction" "_ ruling stand" "_ ruled Friday" "evidence given in _" "_ subsequently ruled in" "_ 's contrary conclusion" "_ is currently deciding whether" "_ rejected the District Court" "_ rejected the Government" "_ decided this case" "_ entered a decision" "_ decides cases" "_ rejected both arguments" "_ reversed that judgment" "_ reinstated a lawsuit" "_ upheld laws" "_ reversed the case" "_ rejected claims" "case transferred to _" "cases submitted to _" "_ 's prior decisions" "factors considered by _" "determinations made by _" "_ rejects challenge" "_ heard the case" "_ rejected those arguments" "_ properly applied the law" "_ hears the appeal" "_ reversed a summary judgment" "_ reversed the conviction" "_ heard a case" "_ recently ruled against" "_ affirmed the award" "_ approves the settlement" "_ accepted jurisdiction" "_ distinguished this case" "_ has upheld the use" "_ recently issued a decision" "_ reversed this decision" "_ reversed the ruling" "_ rejected the government" "_ reversed the appellate court" "_ reversed the District Court" "_ upheld the denial" "_ rejected an appeal" "_ 's findings" "_ rejected this claim" "_ upheld Kentucky" "_ regulates the practice" "_ returned the case" "_ upheld the award" "_ lacked subject matter jurisdiction" "_ is the judicial branch" "_ overturned the ban" "_ 's invalidation" "_ ' conclusion" "_ upheld the sentence" "case pending in _" "_ reviewed the constitutionality" "_ rejected the claim" "_ hears oral arguments" "_ have ruled in" "_ has upheld the decision" "_ makes a determination" "_ eventually ruled in" "_ found no reversible error" "_ has not addressed the issue" "_ denied recovery" "_ denied defendant" "_ denied a motion" "_ vacated the decision" "_ striking down" "_ upheld the program" "_ upheld the judgment" "_ upheld the legality" "_ upheld a ruling" "_ upheld the death penalty" "_ upheld a ban" "_ overturned the sentence" "_ rendered a decision" "_ 's remand" "_ set aside the judgment" "_ upheld the application" "_ remanded for" "_ issued a final ruling" "_ issued a permanent injunction" "_ ruled unanimously on" "_ rejected the lower court" "_ reversed the lower court" "_ ' ruling" "case referred to _" "_ then sent the case" "_ had held in" "_ dismissed an appeal" "_ applied the correct standard" "_ denied an appeal" "_ directed the parties" "_ enforced the Board" "_ did not rule in" "_ addressed whether" "_ had erred in" "_ dismissed this argument" "_ applied an incorrect standard" "_ has scheduled a hearing" "_ overturned the district court" "_ has interpreted this language" "Jurisdiction of _" "_ construed the statute" "_ granted a motion" "_ granted respondents" "_ overturned the award" "_ issued an opinion" "_ ordered a new trial" "_ ordered the return" "_ rejected the reasoning" "_ rejected a similar argument" "_ upheld the lower court decision" "_ upheld that decision" "_ heard the matter" "_ is considering a case" "_ hears the case" "_ ordered the release" "_ has ruled in" "_ heard oral argument" "_ overturned the conviction" "_ has upheld the right" "_ held the evidence" "_ hears case" "_ upheld the Court" "Fourth Court of _" "_ upheld the suspension" "_ reduced the sentence" "_ struck down" "_ upheld an injunction" "_ made no such finding" "_ affirmed the trial court ruling" "_ acted properly in" "_ upheld the ordinance" "_ have ruled on" "_ reached the opposite conclusion" "_ awarded damages" "_ accepts jurisdiction" "_ granted custody" "_ did not reach this issue" "_ has denied a petition" "_ has concurrent jurisdiction" "_ granted the writ" "_ denied the plaintiffs" "_ 's denial" "_ 's majority opinion" "_ reversed the lower court ruling" "_ reversed a ruling" "_ ordered the parties" "_ reversed the trial court" "_ reversed the trial judge" "_ rejected the trial court" "_ found defendant" "_ halted the execution" "_ granted the government" "_ considered the constitutionality" "_ entered judgment" "_ first considered whether" "_ had no jurisdiction" "_ granted review" "_ therefore remanded the case" "cases pending in _" "_ found no abuse" "_ committed no error" "_ has interpreted Section" "_ also rejected the plaintiff" "_ concluded the trial court" "_ granted plaintiffs" "briefs filed with _" "_ denied the appeal" "_ granted certiorari" "_ denied defendants" "_ entered a judgment" "_ are courts" "_ denied the Petition" "_ affirmed a finding" "_ decides the case" "_ affirmed a district court" "cases before _" "_ denies the motion" "_ denied both motions" "_ dismissed the claim" "_ did not determine whether" "_ unanimously ruled against" "clerk of _" "_ holds a public hearing" "_ has ordered a new trial" "_ granted the petitions" "_ affirmed an order" "_ dismissed petitioners" "_ affirmed a judgment" "_ also affirmed the District Court" "_ has affirmed the right" "_ found the defendant" "_ enters an order" "_ granted the defendants" "_ affirmed the jury verdict" "_ rejected this reasoning" "_ held the statute" "_ reversed a lower court ruling" "_ rejected arguments" "_ issued a landmark decision" "_ lifted the stay" "evidence presented before _" "_ sent the case" "case goes to _" "_ found the evidence" "_ affirmed the verdict" "_ has granted certiorari in" "_ did not rule on whether" "_ ruled unanimously in" "_ hears this case" "proceedings before _" "_ rejected the suit" "_ rejected that argument" "_ reversed the dismissal" "_ took judicial notice" "_ vacated the dismissal" "_ upheld the dismissal" "_ upheld the district court" "_ had granted summary judgment" "_ had exclusive jurisdiction" "_ denied this request" "_ correctly granted summary judgment" "_ did not reach the question" "_ reversed the award" "_ reversed this judgment" "_ recently heard oral arguments" "_ ruled on whether" "_ rejected the State" "_ 's finding" "_ set aside the conviction" "_ denied the Motion" "_ affirmed a lower court ruling" "_ did not consider whether" "_ affirmed the district court" "_ accepts a case" "_ ruled the government" "_ granted the defendant’s motion" "_ affirmed the Tax Court" "_ affirmed this ruling" "_ affirmed the conviction" "_ committed an error" "_ had original jurisdiction" "_ granted a stay" "_ reviews the district court" "_ therefore did not err" "_ rejected an effort" "_ rejected the Bush administration" "_ affirmed the judgments" "_ did not err in" "_ certified questions" "_ remanded the cause" "_ overturned that ruling" "_ ordered a stay" "_ lost jurisdiction" "_ ' holding" "_ has sanctioned the use" "_ affirmed the finding" "_ has subject matter jurisdiction" "_ affirmed the injunction" "_ affirmed the District Court" "_ is weighing whether" "_ is an intermediate appellate court" "_ rejected the application" "_ has no original jurisdiction" "_ makes a ruling" "_ rejected a claim" "Courts of _" "_ issued a ruling" "_ rejected plaintiffs" "_ reached the same result" "_ held that summary judgment" "_ upheld the FCC" "_ retains jurisdiction" "_ upheld the law" "_ reviews the trial court" "_ also has original jurisdiction" "_ affirmed the Board" "_ did not have authority" "_ affirmed th" ] using appeals
CPL @1096 (99.2%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 in April of arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in April arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" "arg1 in June arg2" ] using (appeals, n2010)
CPL @1096 (99.2%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" "arg1 in April arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in April of arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" ] using (appeals, n2008)
CPL @1099 (98.4%) on 23-jan-2018 [ "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in April of arg2" ] using (appeals, n2005)
CPL @1099 (98.4%) on 23-jan-2018 [ "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" "arg1 in April arg2" ] using (appeals, n2007)
CPL @1107 (96.9%) on 24-may-2018 [ "arg1 in January arg2" "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in April arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" ] using (appeals, n2001)
CPL @1107 (96.9%) on 24-may-2018 [ "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in January of arg2" "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" ] using (appeals, n2006)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
CPL @1114 (93.8%) on 18-aug-2018 [ "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in February arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" ] using (appeals, n2003)
CPL @1107 (96.9%) on 24-may-2018 [ "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in June arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in April arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" ] using (appeals, n2004)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1105 (93.8%) on 25-mar-2018 [ "arg1 specializing in immigration arg2" "arg1 who specializes in criminal arg2" "arg1 who specializes in insurance arg2" "arg1 who specializes in Social Security arg2" ] using (attorney, appeals)
CPL @1114 (93.8%) on 18-aug-2018 [ "arg1 in April arg2" "arg1 in September arg2" "arg1 in December arg2" "arg1 in January arg2" ] using (appeals, n2009)
CPL @1104 (93.8%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg1 judge for the District of arg2" "arg1 Court of the District of arg2" "arg1 courts in the District of arg2" "arg1 court for the District of arg2" ] using (appeals, columbia)
CPL @1104 (93.8%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg1 judge for the District of arg2" "arg1 Court of the District of arg2" "arg1 courts in the District of arg2" "arg1 court for the District of arg2" ] using (columbia, appeals)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and federal appeals arg1" "arg2 and federal habeas corpus arg1" "arg2 and federal benefit arg1" "arg2 and federal administrative arg1" ] using (appeals, state)
CPL @1095 (87.5%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud arg1" "arg2 from Palestinian President Mahmoud arg1" "arg2 by Palestinian President Mahmoud arg1" ] using (abbas, appeals)