two_previous_digital_signals (parlourgame)
literal strings: two previous digital signals, two_previous_digital_signals
Help NELL Learn!
NELL wants to know if this belief is correct.
If it is or ever was, click thumbs-up. Otherwise, click thumbs-down.
categories
- traditionalgame(100.0%)
- CPL @728 (100.0%) on 28-apr-2013 [ "gun was valued by _" "gun was completed by _" "gun was trusted by _" "gun was flooded by _" "gun was prohibited by _" "gun was documented by _" "gun was engineered by _" "gun was uncovered by _" "gun was simulated by _" "gun was proven by _" "gun was corrected by _" "gun was tracked by _" "gun was scattered by _" "gun was associated by _" "gun was eliminated by _" "gun was fed by _" ] using two_previous_digital_signals
- CMC @616 (99.4%) on 24-jul-2012 [ PREFIX=tw PREFIX=two LASTPREFIX=two PREFIX=two_ LASTPREFIX=two_ FULL_POS=NNS ] using two_previous_digital_signals
- parlourgame(100.0%)
- CMC @505 (99.7%) on 07-feb-2012 [ PREFIX=tw PREFIX=two LASTPREFIX=two PREFIX=two_ LASTPREFIX=two_ LASTPREFIX=tw ] using two_previous_digital_signals
- CPL @728 (100.0%) on 28-apr-2013 [ "gun was valued by _" "gun was accepted by _" "gun was referred by _" "gun was completed by _" "gun was trusted by _" "gun was flooded by _" "gun was prohibited by _" "gun was deprived by _" "gun was burned by _" "gun was discovered by _" "gun was documented by _" "gun was done by _" "gun was engineered by _" "gun was uncovered by _" "gun was simulated by _" "gun was proven by _" "gun was corrected by _" "gun was fashioned by _" "gun was tracked by _" "gun was scattered by _" "gun was associated by _" "gun was inserted by _" "gun was eliminated by _" "gun was produced by _" "gun was fed by _" ] using two_previous_digital_signals