CPL @1107 (80.1%) on 24-may-2018 [ "_ is a weak candidate" "_ joined Sean" "_ is presidential material" "_ is not a fiscal conservative" "_ quit the presidential race" "_ is not the candidate" "_ is a genuine conservative" "presidential candidates like _" "_ is a former senator" "_ lost Iowa" "_ was skewered for" "_ won the debate" "_ was campaigning in" "_ won Michigan" "loon like _" "_ is not a great orator" "_ has a double-digit lead" "_ has been a crusader" "_ is no Lincoln" "_ supports torture" "ad attacking _" "nominee than _" "_ 's Senate office" "_ 's concession speech" "Romney beat _" "_ 's speechwriters" "two-man race between _" "_ 's campaign visit" "_ lost Michigan" "_ is a smart politician" "_ is a dedicated family man" "_ lost the popular vote" "_ is a RINO" "two-man race with _" "_ 's insurgent campaign" "_ 's anti-abortion" "_ 's legislative record" "Stephanopoulos asked _" "_ warned Republicans" "_ became the GOP nominee" "_ 's top aides" "_ is not a serious candidate" "_ is an amazing speaker" "_ takes Ohio" "_ winning Ohio" "candidates like _" "candidate not named _" "_ won the Republican primary" "district went for _" "candidate to unseat _" "war mongers like _" "politicians , like _" "she 's voting for _" "exit polls showed _" "_ trailed Obama" "_ was the actual winner" "_ leads among" "demagogues like _" "populists like _" "_ have the nomination" "_ is a solid conservative" "_ is n't a conservative" "_ 's presidential campaign" "Super PAC supporting _" "_ 's Republican rivals" "_ 's former campaign manager" "fewer delegates than _" "_ were president" "_ was never a conservative" "_ first entered the race" "statist like _" "slim victory over _" "_ is not the first politician" "_ is the only Republican" "_ winning the presidency" "_ was the first presidential candidate" "_ is not a libertarian" "_ was a viable candidate" "_ 's Presidency" "_ is a war hawk" "_ first ran for" "_ has a large lead" "former aide to _" "negative attacks against _" "_ accused Mr. Obama" "_ wins reelection" "_ won the debates" "_ won Wisconsin" "_ won Colorado" "better president than _" "true believer like _" "_ wins the nod" "_ won the states" "_ addressed supporters" "_ 's pro-life views" "_ has won the popular vote" "_ 's political consultant" "voters still think _" "_ 's Iowa victory" "_ 's Senate career" "_ 's Veep" "Republicans , led by _" "_ be the Republican nominee" "_ is campaigning today" "_ leads by about" "_ makes a campaign stop" "_ suspends campaign" "_ trails Obama" "_ be the nominee" "_ exited the race" "_ 's official campaign website" "_ 's executive experience" "_ leading Obama" "_ is the only candidate" "_ is a true conservative" "solid lead over _" "_ is elected president" "_ lost South Carolina" "_ is staunchly anti-abortion" "_ is the nominee" "_ just gave a speech" "_ told Chris Wallace" "_ win the nomination" "_ wrote an op-ed" "_ is just another politician" "_ leads Obama" "_ wins those states" "_ wins Texas" "_ supports tax cuts" "_ is the only presidential candidate" "_ is a flip flopper" "_ is the only other candidate" "_ hits Obama" "_ leads the polls" "primary race against _" "_ is the first Presidential candidate" "_ is no conservative" "_ win the GOP nomination" "_ wins nomination" "_ spent the day campaigning" "_ 's Senate staff" "_ 's debating skills" "_ won the Iowa Caucuses" "_ won the Iowa" "_ is a shrewd politician" "_ is a warmonger" "statistical dead heat with _" "supporters to back _" "_ is not the nominee" "_ holds a lead" "conservative politicians like _" "_ left office" "_ is the only major candidate" "I ever vote for _" "_ 's administration" "_ has criticized Obama" "_ becomes the nominee" "_ 's tax cuts" "_ became a U.S. senator" "_ 's old Senate seat" "way I 'm voting for _" "_ was a social conservative" "_ wins PA" "ad accusing _" "_ won that debate" "_ wins Tuesday" "_ wins the presidency" "Democrat voting for _" "_ gets the Republican nomination" "_ becomes POTUS" "Obama running against _" "politician such as _" "_ 's Senate campaigns" "_ wins the GOP nomination" "_ winning the Republican nomination" "sizable lead over _" "politicians like _" "_ is the Republican nominee" "_ is a fringe candidate" "presidential nomination while _" "general election than _" "_ is the only politician" "_ 's double-digit lead" "evangelicals voted for _" "buffoons like _" "nutjob like _" "_ does n't win the nomination" "_ did better among" "_ carried Ohio" "_ gave this speech" "_ beats Obama" "_ does not win the nomination" "social conservative like _" "he 's endorsed _" "he 's voting for _" "patriot like _" "conservative candidates like _" "_ wins primaries" "_ wins the Republican nomination" "negative ad against _" "_ been the nominee" "_ has a strong lead" "_ winning the state" "_ won enough delegates" "Obama now leads _" "I voting for _" "Romney trails _" "_ 's Secret Service detail" "D-point advantage over _" "landslide for _" "_ 's Senate voting record" "I caucused for _" "_ 's Senate record" "_ 's speech today" "_ beats Mitt Romney" "_ co-sponsored the Community Development Homeownership Tax Credit Act Amends" "polarizing figure like _" "_ 's actual voting record" "_ 's electability argument" "Mitt Romney accused _" "_ 's political guru" "_ needs a game changer" "_ is n't a racist" "_ is the better candidate" "two-person race between _" "_ won states" "mongers like _" "Ron Paul beats _" "delegate than _" "_ won this debate" "_ wins the Republican presidential nomination" "voters went for _" "_ was a better candidate" "_ winning Virginia" "_ was the better candidate" "_ is not a conservative" "_ is a terrible candidate" "_ narrowly won in" "_ loses Ohio" "_ is a statist" "_ is probably the only candidate" "_ is a strong conservative" "He 's voting for _" "Romney lost to _" "_ loses the primary" "_ 's senate record" "_ attacks Obama" "_ 's presidential bid" "_ wins Wisconsin" "_ won Iowa" "_ slams Obama" "campaign adviser for _" "senators like _" "Senate race between _" "_ was n't the only candidate" "_ were the Republican nominee" "_ was the only Republican candidate" "_ was the only senator" "_ 's low approval rating" "_ told George Stephanopoulos" "_ was a social liberal" "_ supports a constitutional amendment" "_ 's religious rhetoric" "_ carried the county" "candidate besides _" "_ is offering a plan" "_ is electable" "_ leads Romney" "super PAC supporting _" "_ is attacking Obama" "_ won Louisiana" "_ won Kansas" "_ won the Iowa Caucus" "_ 's debate performance" "Obama defeat _" "Democrat running against _" "_ holds a DD-point lead" "_ 's campaign trail" "_ 's Tax Plan" "Quinnipiac University poll shows _" "_ has been the only candidate" "_ 's entire campaign" "_ 's national press secretary" "_ 's presidential aspirations" "populist like _" "_ is a career politician" "_ is a Washington insider" "_ is n't president" "other candidates such as _" "_ is seriously considering a run" "_ is a polarizing figure" "candidacy of _" "political leaders like _" "_ won Tennessee" "_ winning Iowa" "senior campaign adviser to _" "negative ads against _" "_ made an unannounced trip" "_ led Romney" "_ is not that candidate" "attack ad on _" "two-man contest between _" "pol like _" "_ won the Iowa caucus" "_ wins Arizona" "_ is too polarizing" "_ is a social conservative" "_ is a fiscal conservative" "_ lost Pennsylvania" "_ made campaign appearances" "_ is a former U.S. Senator" "supporters vote for _" "delegate pledged to _" "_ 's Florida campaign" "primary battle against _" "politician like _" "he was voting for _" "_ was not a fiscal conservative" "_ 's White House" "Ohio voted for _" "_ 's recent remarks" "_ held a slight lead" "election candidate than _" "_ has been declared the winner" "_ also leads among" "_ 's campaign manager" "_ 's recent speech" "_ 's bipartisanship" "_ 's low approval ratings" "_ wins Pennsylvania" "_ won the GOP nomination" "_ told Republicans" "delegates than _" "_ is ahead among" "_ is the Republican candidate" "_ is a Republican candidate" "_ wins the Republican primary" "_ 's reelection chances" "TV ads against _" "Iowa caucuses to _" "_ 's acceptance speech last night" "He came in second to _" "_ 's tax plan" "better debater than _" "_ 's Illinois" "television ads attacking _" "_ conceded the race" "must-win state for _" "_ lost the state" "double-digit lead over _" "candidate like _" "state polls show _" "_ 's approval ratings" "_ won the caucuses" "_ won this state" "_ told AIPAC" "_ has a sizable lead" "_ had been the nominee" "polls have showed _" "primary fight with _" "states won by _" "_ 's chief strategist" "_ loses Iowa" "_ is not a perfect candidate" "_ won the state" "negative coverage than _" "negative ads about _" "virtual dead heat with _" "_ wins Missouri" "_ had the nomination" "_ beat Obama" "_ became a Senator" "_ held a campaign event" "_ is campaigning with" "_ picks Romney" "_ won the Iowa caucuses" "_ was the first candidate" "_ took Iowa" "_ won the county" "_ was polling at" "_ 's environmental views" "McCain is accusing _" "_ 's Democratic challenger" "_ 's campaign aides" "_ 's stump speech" "_ becomes the Republican nominee" "_ carried every county" "_ beats Romney" "_ 's leadership PAC" "_ 's campaign website" "University poll shows _" "_ wins California" "_ won Missouri" "_ won the Michigan primary" "_ winning the nomination" "_ 's polling numbers" "_ 's congressional career" "News projected _" "_ 's U.S. Senate seat" "_ 's presidential hopes" "_ is the Republican frontrunner" "_ is also the only candidate" "_ won primaries" "Romney accused _" "_ does win the nomination" "_ has consistently voted against" "conservatives such as _" "hardliners like _" "polls against _" "_ becoming the Republican nominee" "_ 's political career" "nomination , followed by _" "Romney attacked _" "_ 's running mate" "Republican candidates such as _" "voters broke for _" "electorate voting for _" "_ 's the nominee" "_ 's campaign s" ] using santorum
SEAL @9 (50.0%) on 13-jan-2010 [ 1 ] using santorum
LE @1088 (55.1%) on 23-dec-2017
MBL @1093 (100.0%) on 31-dec-2017 [ Promotion of politician:santorum politicianholdsoffice jobposition:president ]
MBL @1100 (98.4%) on 02-feb-2018 [ Promotion of politician:santorum politicianusholdsoffice jobposition:president ]
CPL @1100 (73.0%) on 30-jan-2018 [ "_ is not a fiscal conservative" "_ quit the presidential race" "_ is a genuine conservative" "presidential candidates like _" "_ is a former senator" "_ lost Iowa" "_ was campaigning in" "_ won Michigan" "_ 's concession speech" "Romney beat _" "_ 's speechwriters" "two-man race between _" "hit-job on _" "_ lost Michigan" "_ is a dedicated family man" "_ lost the popular vote" "_ is a RINO" "two-man race with _" "_ 's insurgent campaign" "_ 's anti-abortion" "_ became the GOP nominee" "_ is not a serious candidate" "_ winning Ohio" "candidates like _" "candidate not named _" "_ won the Republican primary" "career politicians like _" "candidate to unseat _" "war mongers like _" "_ was the actual winner" "_ have the nomination" "_ is a solid conservative" "_ is n't a conservative" "_ 's presidential campaign" "Super PAC supporting _" "_ 's former campaign manager" "_ were president" "_ was never a conservative" "statist like _" "slim victory over _" "_ is the only Republican" "_ is not a libertarian" "_ 's Presidency" "_ is a war hawk" "_ first ran for" "_ accused Mr. Obama" "_ won Colorado" "better president than _" "_ won the states" "_ addressed supporters" "_ has won the popular vote" "_ 's political consultant" "_ 's favorability numbers" "_ 's Senate career" "Republicans , led by _" "_ be the Republican nominee" "_ is campaigning today" "_ makes a campaign stop" "_ suspends campaign" "_ trails Obama" "_ exited the race" "_ 's official campaign website" "_ 's executive experience" "Republican party if _" "_ leading Obama" "_ is the only candidate" "_ is a true conservative" "solid lead over _" "_ lost South Carolina" "_ is staunchly anti-abortion" "_ just gave a speech" "_ told Chris Wallace" "_ wrote an op-ed" "_ leads Obama" "_ wins those states" "_ is the only presidential candidate" "_ is the only other candidate" "primary race against _" "_ is no conservative" "_ win the GOP nomination" "_ spent the day campaigning" "_ won the Iowa Caucuses" "_ is a warmonger" "statistical dead heat with _" "conservative politicians like _" "stronger general election candidate than _" "_ 's tax cuts" "_ wins Tuesday" "_ gets the Republican nomination" "Obama running against _" "politician such as _" "_ 's Senate campaigns" "_ wins the GOP nomination" "_ winning the Republican nomination" "sizable lead over _" "_ is the Republican nominee" "_ is the only politician" "evangelicals voted for _" "_ carried Ohio" "_ beats Obama" "social conservative like _" "he 's endorsed _" "conservative candidates like _" "_ wins primaries" "_ wins the Republican nomination" "_ been the nominee" "Obama now leads _" "I voting for _" "_ beats Mitt Romney" "polarizing figure like _" "dimwits like _" "Mitt Romney accused _" "_ 's political guru" "two-person race between _" "significant lead over _" "dodger like _" "_ won this debate" "_ wins the Republican presidential nomination" "_ was a better candidate" "_ is not a conservative" "_ is a terrible candidate" "_ narrowly won in" "_ is probably the only candidate" "_ is a strong conservative" "Romney lost to _" "_ attacks Obama" "_ 's presidential bid" "_ wins Wisconsin" "_ slams Obama" "campaign adviser for _" "top surrogate for _" "senators like _" "GOP candidates like _" "Senate race between _" "_ was n't the only candidate" "_ were the Republican nominee" "_ was the only Republican candidate" "_ 's low approval rating" "_ was the only GOP candidate" "_ was a social liberal" "_ carried the county" "super PAC supporting _" "_ won Louisiana" "_ won Kansas" "_ 's debate performance" "Obama defeat _" "_ has been the only candidate" "_ 's national press secretary" "_ 's presidential aspirations" "populist like _" "_ is a Washington insider" "other candidates such as _" "_ is a polarizing figure" "political leaders like _" "_ won Tennessee" "two-man contest between _" "pol like _" "_ 's surprising win" "_ is too polarizing" "_ is a social conservative" "_ has been campaigning with" "_ is a fiscal conservative" "_ is a former U.S. Senator" "delegate pledged to _" "_ 's Florida campaign" "primary battle against _" "politician like _" "_ was not a fiscal conservative" "_ 's White House" "Ohio voted for _" "likely voters shows _" "_ held a slight lead" "election candidate than _" "_ has been declared the winner" "_ also called Obama" "_ 's campaign manager" "_ 's re-election" "_ 's low approval ratings" "_ won the GOP nomination" "_ Says America" "_ is the Republican candidate" "_ is a Republican candidate" "_ wins the Republican primary" "TV ads against _" "Iowa caucuses to _" "He came in second to _" "_ lost the state" "double-digit lead over _" "candidate like _" "_ 's approval ratings" "GOP candidates , including _" "_ won this state" "_ had been the nominee" "primary fight with _" "states won by _" "_ won the state" "negative coverage than _" "_ had the nomination" "_ beat Obama" "_ won the Iowa caucuses" "_ was the first candidate" "_ won the county" "_ 's environmental views" "_ 's Democratic challenger" "_ 's campaign aides" "_ 's stump speech" "_ becomes the Republican nominee" "_ carried every county" "_ won Missouri" "_ won the Michigan primary" "_ 's congressional career" "News projected _" "_ 's U.S. Senate seat" "_ 's presidential hopes" "_ is the Republican frontrunner" "_ is not the only Republican" "Romney accused _" "_ has consistently voted against" "conservatives such as _" "_ becoming the Republican nominee" "nomination , followed by _" "_ 's running mate" "Republican candidates such as _" "_ 's debate performances" "Obama beats _" "_ 's Republican presidential campaign" "PAC supporting _" "_ won both states" "primary won by _" "_ is no Ronald Reagan" "_ is no Reagan" "_ had been elected President" "_ 's campaign rallies" "Dems like _" "Mitt Romney beat _" "primary loss to _" "viable conservative alternative to _" "_ is a compassionate conservative" "_ is not conservative enough" "conservative vote with _" "vote margin over _" "_ joining the Senate" "_ had won the popular vote" "_ has campaigned with" "surprise endorsement of _" "_ had a double-digit lead" "_ did n't wait until" "_ was a fiscal conservative" "_ were the GOP nominee" "presidential candidates including _" "formidable candidate than _" "republicans voted for _" "_ wins Michigan" "_ swept primaries" "American politicians like _" "voting record than _" "Republicans like _" "_ 's first Senate campaign" "_ beat Romney" "consistent lead over _" "candidate except _" "warmonger like _" "_ 's approval numbers" "_ 's Senate seat" "_ won the popular vote" "_ carried the state" "_ getting the Republican nomination" "_ 's reelection" "eight-point lead over _" "_ is not a Conservative" "GOP ticket with _" "bill co-sponsored by _" "_ winning this nomination" "_ win South Carolina" "liberal like _" "_ 's campaign officials" "Obama leads _" "_ did very well among" "_ endorses Mitt Romney" "more formidable candidate than _" "_ winning Michigan" "_ was the only Republican" "other candidate besides _" "_ holds a narrow lead" "Tim Russert asked _" "much better candidate than _" "life-sized cardboard cutout of _" "_ is not the perfect candidate" "statistical tie with _" "conservative like _" "campaign adviser to _" "_ leads Mitt Romney" "_ gets the GOP nomination" "_ trailing Obama" "_ addresses supporters" "_ 's tax cut" "_ is not a real conservative" "RINOs like _" "he still trails _" "_ 's White House bid" "Republican candidates , including _" "_ 's farewell speech" "_ won the debate last night" "_ win the Republican nomination" "_ was the only politician" "_ stole the election" "candidate , say _" "_ won every county" "_ won Ohio" "conservatives like _" "_ makes campaign stop" "attack ad against _" "negative ads attacking _" "hypocrites like _" "_ beat Gingrich" "Candidates such as _" "third-party candidate if _" "general election candidate than _" "double digit lead over _" "_ 's Presidential campaign" "_ 's reelection campaign" "_ is that candidate" "_ is n't the only politician" "_ is the GOP candidate" "_ is the only GOP candidate" "_ won caucuses" "_ was a big spender" "loser named _" "nutcase like _" "_ has won the state" "conservative alternative to _" "delegate lead over _" "delegates left for _" "candidate such as _" "_ 's Iowa campaign" "Obama tied with _" "_ 's speech last night" "_ is an honorable man" "_ also campaigned in" "_ carry Pennsylvania" "running mate like _" "_ had won Iowa" "GOP leaders like _" "_ is a Republican senator" "digit lead over _" "primaries against _" "other candidate except _" "He 's as bad as _" "religious conservatives like _" "_ 's conservative credentials" "_ is the GOP nominee" "_ had a double digit lead" "_ get the Republican nomination" "_ is n’t a conservative" "_ s campaign" "Barack Obama leading _" "Obama beating _" "nominee were _" "_ becomes the GOP nominee" "career politician like _" "_ 's campaign debt" "_ 's poll numbers" "Republicans such as _" "_ wins South Carolina" "_ were a Democrat" "_ won Oklahoma" "_ is the true conservative" "_ made a campaign stop" "_ being the Republican nominee" "_ won Alabama" "Republican candidates like _" ] using santorum
CPL @1094 (99.9%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Frist and Senator arg1" "arg2 Biden and Senator arg1" "arg2 from Pennsylvania Rick arg1" "arg2 Kennedy and Senator arg1" "arg2 John Kerry and Senator arg1" "arg2 Specter and arg1" "arg2 Lieberman and Senator arg1" "arg2 Lieberman and arg1" "arg2 Cochran for Senator arg1" "arg2 Specter and Senator arg1" ] using (santorum, senator)
OE @820 (91.5%) on 06-mar-2014 [ ] using (santorum, senator)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1096 (98.4%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is our next arg2" "arg1 is unqualified to be arg2" "arg1 will be our next arg2" "arg1 is ready to be arg2" "arg1 began running for arg2" ] using (santorum, president)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is running for arg2" "arg1 was campaigning for arg2" ] using (santorum, reelection)
OE @808 (88.9%) on 29-jan-2014 [ ] using (santorum, senators)
CPL @1094 (99.6%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 DeMint and arg1" "arg2 Daschle and arg1" "arg2 Domenici and arg1" "arg2 Lieberman and arg1" "arg2 Mikulski and arg1" "arg2 Boxer and arg1" "arg2 Lott and arg1" "arg2 Specter and arg1" ] using (santorum, senators)
SEAL @189 (50.0%) on 15-jan-2011 [ 1 ] using (santorum, senators)
CPL @1094 (99.9%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Frist and Senator arg1" "arg2 Biden and Senator arg1" "arg2 from Pennsylvania Rick arg1" "arg2 Kennedy and Senator arg1" "arg2 John Kerry and Senator arg1" "arg2 Specter and arg1" "arg2 Lieberman and Senator arg1" "arg2 Lieberman and arg1" "arg2 Cochran for Senator arg1" "arg2 Specter and Senator arg1" ] using (santorum, senator)
OE @820 (91.5%) on 06-mar-2014 [ ] using (santorum, senator)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and former first lady Barbara arg2" "arg1 or President arg2" "arg1 criticized President arg2" "arg1 as well as President arg2" "arg1 and Jeb arg2" "arg1 and President arg2" ] using (santorum, bush)
CPL @1096 (98.4%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was running for arg2" "arg1 is our next arg2" "arg1 is unqualified to be arg2" "arg1 will be our next arg2" "arg1 is ready to be arg2" "arg1 began running for arg2" ] using (santorum, president)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 were to win the White arg2" "arg1 taking the White arg2" "arg1 wins the White arg2" "arg1 anywhere near the White arg2" ] using (santorum, house)