CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 is the writer of arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 began to write his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 is a synoptic arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 would have written his arg1" "arg2 wrote both arg1" "arg2 wrote the third arg1" "arg2 begins and ends his arg1" "arg2 tells in his arg1" "arg2 to explain the beauty of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 who also wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 in his record of arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 from which he derived his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 dedicated both his arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 included it in his arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 was the writer of arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 as a sequel to his arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 in his writing of arg1" "arg2 must have written his arg1" ] using (gospel, luke)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 according to St arg1" "arg2 and epistles of arg1" "arg2 of John In arg1" "arg2 of John Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of John The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Thomas Gospel of arg1" "arg2 According to St arg1" "arg2 of Mark The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Mark or arg1" "arg2 of John through arg1" "arg2 reading is from arg1" "arg2 of Matthew or arg1" "arg2 of Jesus Christ According to arg1" "arg2 According to Saint arg1" "arg2 reading was from arg1" "arg2 was written by the apostle arg1" "arg2 according to Saint arg1" "arg2 According to Peter arg1" "arg2 and in the letters of arg1" ] using (john, gospel)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 of Matthew The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Mark Gospel of arg1" "arg2 written and that arg1" "arg2 according to St arg1" "arg2 was written by Saint arg1" "arg2 reading was from arg1" "arg2 that were deleted in arg1" "arg2 message found in arg1" "arg2 of Mark or arg1" "arg2 of Matthew was written by arg1" "arg2 reading according to arg1" "arg2 lesson is from arg1" "arg2 according to Saint arg1" "arg2 was written by the apostle arg1" "arg2 reading is from arg1" "arg2 According to St arg1" "arg2 reading was taken from arg1" "arg2 According to Saint arg1" ] using (matthew, gospel)
CPL @1103 (99.8%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 who are righteous in arg1" "arg2 of the only Son of arg1" "arg2 a righteousness from arg1" "arg2 of the Lord your arg1" "arg2 the righteousness of arg1" "arg2 tell us how to love arg1" "arg2 is still the power of arg1" "arg2 of Mark The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Jesus Christ which arg1" ] using (god, gospel)
CPL @1103 (96.9%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 according to Saint arg1" "arg2 According to Saint arg1" "arg2 of Jesus Christ which arg1" "arg2 given to the apostle arg1" "arg2 according to St arg1" ] using (paul, gospel)
CPL @1103 (96.9%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 According to Saint arg1" "arg2 of Thomas Gospel of arg1" "arg2 According to St arg1" "arg2 according to St arg1" "arg2 according to Saint arg1" ] using (thomas, gospel)
CPL @1103 (93.8%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 reading was taken from arg1" "arg2 reading was from arg1" "arg2 reading is from arg1" "arg2 message found in arg1" ] using (matthew_25, gospel)
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, saint_john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" ] using (gospel, time_matthew)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, saint_john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1095 (93.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 had also written arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, st___mark)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1096 (100.0%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 was written by Saint arg2" "arg1 reading was from arg2" "arg1 of Mark or arg2" "arg1 reading according to arg2" "arg1 story according to arg2" "arg1 written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" "arg1 was written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 reading is from arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 of Christ according to arg2" "arg1 According to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, matthew)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1095 (96.9%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 said in arg1" "arg2 describes in arg1" "arg2 teaches us in arg1" "arg2 speaks in arg1" "arg2 says in arg1" ] using (gospel, saviour)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1096 (100.0%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 was written by Saint arg2" "arg1 reading was from arg2" "arg1 of Mark or arg2" "arg1 reading according to arg2" "arg1 story according to arg2" "arg1 written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" "arg1 was written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 reading is from arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 of Christ according to arg2" "arg1 According to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, matthew)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 is not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 and Barnabas preached arg1" "arg2 when he presents his arg1" "arg2 wrote was arg1" "arg2 not ashamed of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 should not be ashamed of arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" "arg2 says that even when arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" ] using (gospel, paul)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" ] using (gospel, saint_john)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (87.5%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 was written by the Apostle arg2" "arg1 of Christ according to arg2" "arg1 reading is from arg2" ] using (gospel, st___matthew)
CPL @1105 (87.5%) on 25-mar-2018 [ "arg2 was a preacher of arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 endured for the sake of arg1" ] using (gospel, st___paul)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1096 (100.0%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 was written by Saint arg2" "arg1 reading was from arg2" "arg1 of Mark or arg2" "arg1 reading according to arg2" "arg1 story according to arg2" "arg1 written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" "arg1 was written by the apostle arg2" "arg1 reading is from arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 of Christ according to arg2" "arg1 According to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, matthew)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 Gospel of Mark arg1" "arg2 wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 is most famous for writing arg1" "arg2 could have written his arg1" "arg2 as the writer of arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 makes clear in his arg1" "arg2 is thought to have written arg1" "arg2 was when he wrote arg1" "arg2 might have written arg1" "arg2 penned arg1" "arg2 was the author of arg1" "arg2 compiled his arg1" "arg2 himself wrote his arg1" "arg2 penned his arg1" "arg2 possibly wrote arg1" "arg2 wrote his account of arg1" "arg2 tells us in his arg1" "arg2 may have written his arg1" "arg2 presents it in arg1" "arg2 had not written arg1" "arg2 published his arg1" "arg2 used the same word in arg1" "arg2 writes in his arg1" "arg2 starts out his arg1" "arg2 composed his arg1" "arg2 sat down to write his arg1" "arg2 is writing his arg1" "arg2 informs us in his arg1" "arg2 but rather comes from arg1" "arg2 did not write his arg1" "arg2 is the least reliable arg1" "arg2 Gospel of John arg1" "arg2 was writing his arg1" "arg2 is saying in arg1" "arg2 testifies in his arg1" "arg2 probably wrote arg1" "arg2 does not begin his arg1" "arg2 reminded us in his arg1" "arg2 relates in his arg1" "arg2 refers to in arg1" "arg2 puts it in his arg1" "arg2 came to write his arg1" "arg2 declares in his arg1" "arg2 Gospel of Luke arg1" "arg2 gives us in his arg1" "arg2 thus begins his arg1" "arg2 describes in his arg1" "arg2 sat down and wrote arg1" "arg2 is unique to his arg1" "arg2 who wrote the fourth arg1" "arg2 Paul II s arg1" "arg2 probably wrote his arg1" "arg2 at the opening of his arg1" ] using (gospel, john)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 According to Saint arg2" "arg1 of Thomas Gospel of arg2" "arg1 according to the Apostle arg2" "arg1 According to St arg2" "arg1 attributed to the apostle arg2" "arg1 and Revelation of arg2" "arg1 according to St arg2" "arg1 according to Saint arg2" ] using (gospel, thomas)
CPL @1095 (99.2%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 had been preaching arg1" "arg2 had preached arg1" "arg2 preached a different arg1" "arg2 wrote his arg1" "arg2 had been entrusted with arg1" "arg2 were preaching arg1" "arg2 who first preached arg1" ] using (gospel, peter)
CPL @1096 (96.9%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and young people with arg2" "arg1 and teens with arg2" "arg1 and youth with arg2" "arg1 and teenagers with arg2" "arg1 and adults with arg2" ] using (children, gospel)
CPL @1104 (96.9%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg2 and reggae to arg1" "arg2 and jazz influenced arg1" "arg2 or rhythm and arg1" "arg2 music and rhythm and arg1" "arg2 and rhythm and arg1" ] using (blues, gospel)
CPL @1113 (99.9%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg2 artists such as arg1" "arg2 music icon arg1" "arg2 music from artists like arg1" "arg2 artists like arg1" "arg2 music artists such as arg1" "arg2 acts such as arg1" "arg2 music reminiscent of arg1" "arg2 artists including arg1" "arg2 music sensation arg1" "arg2 musicians such as arg1" ] using (kirk_franklin, gospel)
CPL @1103 (98.4%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 Magdelene and arg2" "arg1 Magdalene is arg2" "arg1 and bestowed on him arg2" "arg1 Magdalene and arg2" "arg1 of Magdala arg2" "arg1 and birth of Jesus arg2" ] using (mary, gospel)
CPL @1103 (100.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 according to St arg1" "arg2 and epistles of arg1" "arg2 of John In arg1" "arg2 of John Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of John The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Thomas Gospel of arg1" "arg2 According to St arg1" "arg2 of Mark The Gospel of arg1" "arg2 of Mark or arg1" "arg2 of John through arg1" "arg2 reading is from arg1" "arg2 of Matthew or arg1" "arg2 of Jesus Christ According to arg1" "arg2 According to Saint arg1" "arg2 reading was from arg1" "arg2 was written by the apostle arg1" "arg2 according to Saint arg1" "arg2 According to Peter arg1" "arg2 and in the letters of arg1" ] using (john, gospel)
CPL @1113 (93.8%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg2 music star arg1" "arg2 artists like arg1" "arg2 artists such as arg1" "arg2 singers such as arg1" ] using (donnie_mcclurkin, gospel)