SEAL @178 (87.5%) on 14-dec-2010 [ 123 ] using blazers
CPL @1097 (80.8%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "_ were often worn with" "pants , tailored _" "outerwear including _" "members wear red _" "men in silly _" "custom made tall _" "men in red _" "jeans , studded _" "kids in blue _" "boys wore _" "full sleeved _" "sweaters , casual _" "sweaters , black _" "shorts , fitted _" "attire is usually _" "boys did not wear _" "outer garments such as _" "khaki pants , black _" "men wearing dark _" "quality men s _" "white , wearing _" "wear includes _" "flashy pair of _" "pants , striped _" "they wore blue _" "shirts , loose _" "jeans , embroidered _" "they still wore _" "uniforms , blue _" "blue pants , blue _" "jeans , tailored _" "slacks , blue _" "shorts , lightweight _" "pants , casual _" "turtlenecks with _" "dresses , fitted _" "girls in blue _" "jeans , cropped _" "black pants , red _" "blazer , white _" "men are wearing _" "short , fitted _" "shorts , cropped _" "men in grey _" "sweaters , to _" "breast pocket of _" "_ run a bit small" "leggings , black _" "mens travel _" "shirts , red _" "uniforms of blue _" "shirts , corporate _" "they wore matching _" "jackets / _" "slacks with _" "formal apparel including _" "guys in blue _" "boys commonly wore _" "mens formal _" "dresses paired with _" "jackets , casual _" "cute fitted _" "men in striped _" "long , fitted _" "mens denim _" "pants with black _" "gorgeous fitted _" "apparel including _" "pants , gold _" "men in dark _" "dresses , blue _" "blouses under _" "attire such as _" "patch pockets on _" "Men wear _" "Men in dark _" "shirt , red _" "mens suede _" "range of woolen _" "They wear red _" "boys wear blue _" "pants paired with _" "separates such as _" "grey checked _" "leather pants , black _" "_ is often worn with" "people wearing green _" "blazer , grey _" "black , fitted _" "boys wears _" "guards in blue _" "great worn with _" "shorts , white _" "pants , red _" "Girls wear _" "uniforms consisting of _" "white shirt , red _" "tops , fitted _" "year I wore _" "boys also wore _" "dress pants with _" "skirt suit with _" "shirts , oversized _" "shirts , black _" "women in white _" "shoulder padded _" "tank tops under _" "clothing , including _" "you hate wearing _" "clothing like _" "jeans , casual _" "clothing , warm _" "pants , long _" "shirts , hooded _" "women in brown _" "white pants , blue _" "young men wearing _" "shirts , tailored _" "perfect fitted _" "they wear blue _" "wear expensive _" "pants , tall _" "white fitted _" "white tailored _" "wear , woven _" "uniform of blue _" "pants , light _" "men in white _" "jeans , oversized _" "mens casual _" "womens western _" "boys wore blue _" "shirts underneath _" "men in funny _" "scarves , knit _" "sport coat with _" "fleece hooded _" "shirts , striped _" "men have been wearing _" "womens long _" "uniform of red _" "pants , black _" "coats , long _" "uniform of black _" "trousers , black _" "They wore blue _" "tops , cropped _" "white shirts , black _" "pants , oversized _" "length sleeved _" "wear yellow _" "young men wore _" "trousers , tailored _" "Single breasted _" "uniform of grey _" "officers in blue _" "women in smart _" "sleeves , blue _" "tops with black _" "dresses , tailored _" "shorts paired with _" "size beaded _" "students were wearing _" "apparel items such as _" "dresses , stylish _" "garments such as _" "dresses , cropped _" "jeans , fitted _" "jackets , black _" "people in blue _" "men in blue _" "clothing such as _" "skirts , tailored _" "men wear traditional _" "jackets , suede _" "jackets , tailored _" "age dressed in _" "skirts , cropped _" "clothing , such as _" "cardigans to _" "badges worn on _" "Floral printed _" "boys wearing _" "girls in white _" "schools wearing _" "_ are generally worn on" "trousers , sleeveless _" "uniform , blue _" "pants , blue _" "shirts , blue _" "cotton fitted _" "skirts , short _" "boys wear black _" "blazers , white _" "coats , black _" "students in blue _" "blouses , tailored _" "pants , short _" "skirts worn with _" "skirts , fitted _" "shirts , fitted _" "Men in white _" "selection of cashmere _" "fashion items including _" "trousers , blue _" "pants , fitted _" "Boys wear black _" "Men in blue _" "They wear blue _" "_ cinched at" "coats , tailored _" "ties , blue _" "shirt paired with _" "Double breasted _" "outerwear like _" "attire includes _" "clothes such as _" "outerwear , such as _" "pair of fancy _" ] using blazers
Human feedback from estevam @447 on 03-nov-2011 [ "blazers clothingtogowithclothing shirts", Action=(+clothingtogowithclothing) (from NELL.08m.447.SSFeedback.csv) ] using blazers
MBL @1080 (93.8%) on 02-dec-2017 [ Promotion of clothing:blazers clothingtogowithclothing clothing:slacks ]
CMC @1066 (98.4%) on 12-jul-2017 [ LASTPREFIX=blaze 1.09175 LASTPREFIX=blaz 1.07645 LASTPREFIX=bl 1.04183 PREFIX=blaze 1.03809 PREFIX=blaz 1.00548 PREFIX=bl 0.92557 SUFFIX=ers 0.89805 WORDS -0.59590 FULL_POS=NNS -0.69209 CHARS -2.74674 ] using blazers
OE @805 (100.0%) on 20-jan-2014 [ ] using (shirts, blazers)
Human feedback from estevam @447 on 03-nov-2011 [ "blazers clothingtogowithclothing shirts", Action=(+clothingtogowithclothing) (from NELL.08m.447.SSFeedback.csv) ] using (blazers, shirts)
OE @805 (100.0%) on 20-jan-2014 [ ] using (blazers, shirts)
Human feedback from estevam @447 on 03-nov-2011 [ "blazers clothingtogowithclothing shirts", Action=(+clothingtogowithclothing) (from NELL.08m.447.SSFeedback.csv) ] using (shirts, blazers)
OE @805 (100.0%) on 20-jan-2014 [ ] using (shirts, blazers)
Human feedback from estevam @447 on 03-nov-2011 [ "blazers clothingtogowithclothing shirts", Action=(+clothingtogowithclothing) (from NELL.08m.447.SSFeedback.csv) ] using (blazers, shirts)
OE @805 (100.0%) on 20-jan-2014 [ ] using (blazers, shirts)
Human feedback from estevam @447 on 03-nov-2011 [ "blazers clothingtogowithclothing shirts", Action=(+clothingtogowithclothing) (from NELL.08m.447.SSFeedback.csv) ] using (shirts, blazers)
CPL @1116 (99.2%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and trousers or arg2" "arg1 with slacks or arg2" "arg1 and baggy arg2" "arg1 to tops to arg2" "arg1 and plaid arg2" "arg1 with shorts or arg2" "arg1 and pants or arg2" ] using (blazers, skirts)
CPL @1116 (99.2%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and trousers or arg2" "arg1 with slacks or arg2" "arg1 and baggy arg2" "arg1 to tops to arg2" "arg1 and plaid arg2" "arg1 with shorts or arg2" "arg1 and pants or arg2" ] using (skirts, blazers)
CPL @1116 (99.2%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and trousers or arg2" "arg1 with slacks or arg2" "arg1 and baggy arg2" "arg1 to tops to arg2" "arg1 and plaid arg2" "arg1 with shorts or arg2" "arg1 and pants or arg2" ] using (blazers, skirts)
CPL @1116 (99.2%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and trousers or arg2" "arg1 with slacks or arg2" "arg1 and baggy arg2" "arg1 to tops to arg2" "arg1 and plaid arg2" "arg1 with shorts or arg2" "arg1 and pants or arg2" ] using (skirts, blazers)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and pullover arg1" "arg2 and pants to arg1" "arg2 and knee length arg1" "arg2 and tank arg1" "arg2 and blouses to arg1" ] using (blazers, dresses)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and pullover arg1" "arg2 and pants to arg1" "arg2 and knee length arg1" "arg2 and tank arg1" "arg2 and blouses to arg1" ] using (dresses, blazers)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and pullover arg1" "arg2 and pants to arg1" "arg2 and knee length arg1" "arg2 and tank arg1" "arg2 and blouses to arg1" ] using (blazers, dresses)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and pullover arg1" "arg2 and pants to arg1" "arg2 and knee length arg1" "arg2 and tank arg1" "arg2 and blouses to arg1" ] using (dresses, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 with skirt or arg2" "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and navy blue arg2" "arg1 and flannel arg2" ] using (slacks, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 with skirt or arg2" "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and navy blue arg2" "arg1 and flannel arg2" ] using (blazers, slacks)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 with skirt or arg2" "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and navy blue arg2" "arg1 and flannel arg2" ] using (slacks, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 with skirt or arg2" "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and navy blue arg2" "arg1 and flannel arg2" ] using (blazers, slacks)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (trousers, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (blazers, trousers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (trousers, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (blazers, trousers)
CPL @1098 (87.5%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg2 head coach arg1" "arg2 have fired head coach arg1" "arg2 fired head coach arg1" ] using (nate_mcmillan, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (trousers, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (blazers, trousers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (trousers, blazers)
CPL @1096 (93.8%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and khaki arg2" "arg1 and gray flannel arg2" "arg1 and white flannel arg2" "arg1 and white duck arg2" ] using (blazers, trousers)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 in that game was arg1" "arg2 star forward arg1" "arg2 power forward arg1" "arg2 should not trade arg1" ] using (lamarcus_aldridge, blazers)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 head coach arg1" "arg2 have fired head coach arg1" "arg2 fired head coach arg1" ] using (nate_mcmillan, blazers)
CPL @1094 (96.9%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 coach arg1" "arg2 head coach arg1" "arg2 have fired head coach arg1" "arg2 and head coach arg1" "arg2 fired head coach arg1" ] using (nate_mcmillan, blazers)
CPL @1100 (99.2%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 quit on arg1" "arg2 coach arg1" "arg2 head coach arg1" "arg2 have fired head coach arg1" "arg2 and head coach arg1" "arg2 fired head coach arg1" "arg2 are coached by arg1" ] using (nate_mcmillan, blazers)
CPL @1104 (99.6%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg2 in the DDDD NBA arg1" "arg2 won the NBA arg1" "arg2 to the NBA arg1" "arg2 to two NBA arg1" "arg2 are in the NBA arg1" "arg2 went to the NBA arg1" "arg2 in the western conference arg1" "arg2 in the DDDD Western Conference arg1" ] using (finals, blazers)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 have lost seven straight arg1" "arg2 won DD more arg1" "arg2 won four straight arg1" "arg2 played one of their best arg1" "arg2 have won two consecutive arg1" "arg2 have won four straight arg1" "arg2 won only DD arg1" "arg2 have DD home arg1" "arg2 still won DD arg1" "arg2 dropped all three arg1" "arg2 lost their last three arg1" "arg2 won the first two arg1" "arg2 will play DD home arg1" "arg2 will play their home arg1" "arg2 have lost six consecutive arg1" "arg2 have won five straight arg1" "arg2 lost the first two arg1" "arg2 have lost three arg1" "arg2 have won two straight arg1" "arg2 have won three straight arg1" "arg2 dropped consecutive arg1" "arg2 have played DD arg1" "arg2 have played two fewer arg1" "arg2 will win DD arg1" "arg2 after missing the last four arg1" "arg2 have lost three straight arg1" "arg2 were swept in three arg1" "arg2 play their home arg1" "arg2 have won four consecutive arg1" "arg2 have won eight consecutive arg1" "arg2 won just DD arg1" "arg2 will win their share of arg1" "arg2 play home arg1" "arg2 win DD arg1" "arg2 will play home arg1" "arg2 have three home arg1" "arg2 have lost their last D arg1" "arg2 have lost their last three arg1" "arg2 have now lost three arg1" "arg2 have lost D straight arg1" "arg2 won their first two arg1" "arg2 have lost their last two arg1" "arg2 have won DD straight arg1" "arg2 have won their last four arg1" "arg2 play road arg1" "arg2 will play eight arg1" "arg2 have played more arg1" ] using (games, blazers)
CPL @1104 (99.2%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg2 past the first round of arg1" "arg2 to the NBA arg1" "arg2 into the Western Conference arg1" "arg2 and Spurs in arg1" "arg2 squeaked into arg1" "arg2 will be lucky to make arg1" "arg2 were bounced from arg1" ] using (playoffs, blazers)
CPL @1099 (93.8%) on 23-jan-2018 [ "arg2 to the DDDD NBA arg1" "arg2 win the NBA arg1" "arg2 are not going to win arg1" "arg2 to the NBA arg1" ] using (title, blazers)
SEAL @17 (50.0%) on 16-jan-2010 [ 1 ] using (brandon_roy, blazers)
CPL @1094 (100.0%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 shooting guard arg1" "arg2 took the lead on arg1" "arg2 point guard arg1" "arg2 drafted arg1" "arg2 will likely be without arg1" "arg2 Greg Oden and arg1" "arg2 were led by arg1" "arg2 were again without arg1" "arg2 guard arg1" "arg2 were missing arg1" "arg2 won without arg1" "arg2 in that game was arg1" ] using (brandon_roy, blazers)
CPL @1094 (99.2%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 in that game was arg1" "arg2 star forward arg1" "arg2 captain arg1" "arg2 power forward arg1" "arg2 should not trade arg1" "arg2 were led by arg1" "arg2 forward arg1" ] using (lamarcus_aldridge, blazers)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and Portland Trail arg2" "arg1 beat the snot out of arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" "arg1 match up well with arg2" ] using (celtics, blazers)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Boston arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" ] using (boston_celtics, blazers)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Boston arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, boston_celtics)
OE @809 (95.9%) on 01-feb-2014 [ ] using (blazers, celtics)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 and Portland Trail arg2" "arg1 beat the snot out of arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" "arg1 match up well with arg2" ] using (blazers, celtics)
OE @809 (95.9%) on 01-feb-2014 [ ] using (celtics, blazers)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 outscored arg1" "arg2 and the Chicago arg1" "arg2 defeated the Chicago arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" ] using (bulls, blazers)
CPL @1097 (96.9%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 outscored arg1" "arg2 and the Chicago arg1" "arg2 defeated the Chicago arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" ] using (blazers, bulls)
CPL @1097 (93.8%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, chicago_bulls)
CPL @1097 (93.8%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (chicago_bulls, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, cleveland_cavaliers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" ] using (cleveland_cavaliers, blazers)
CPL @1115 (75.0%) on 27-aug-2018 [ "arg1 have talked to arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" ] using (blazers, cavs)
CPL @1115 (75.0%) on 27-aug-2018 [ "arg1 have talked to arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" ] using (cavs, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 take on the Portland arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, dallas_mavericks)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 take on the Portland arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (dallas_mavericks, blazers)
CPL @1096 (99.2%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 beat arg2" "arg1 blew out arg2" "arg1 have already beaten arg2" "arg1 outrebounded arg2" "arg1 beat the Denver arg2" "arg1 lost to the Denver arg2" "arg1 Anthony leads arg2" ] using (blazers, nuggets)
CPL @1096 (99.2%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg1 beat arg2" "arg1 blew out arg2" "arg1 have already beaten arg2" "arg1 outrebounded arg2" "arg1 beat the Denver arg2" "arg1 lost to the Denver arg2" "arg1 Anthony leads arg2" ] using (nuggets, blazers)
CPL @1113 (75.0%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg1 lost to arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" ] using (denver_nuggets, blazers)
CPL @1113 (75.0%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg1 lost to arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" ] using (blazers, denver_nuggets)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, golden_state_warriors)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (golden_state_warriors, blazers)
CPL @1096 (98.4%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 defeated the Atlanta arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 and Red arg1" "arg2 or Red arg1" "arg2 have outscored arg1" ] using (hawks, blazers)
CPL @1096 (98.4%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 defeated the Atlanta arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 and Red arg1" "arg2 or Red arg1" "arg2 have outscored arg1" ] using (blazers, hawks)
CPL @1095 (99.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 rout arg1" "arg2 and the Trail arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 acquired him from arg1" "arg2 romped over arg1" "arg2 blew out arg1" "arg2 beat the Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, knicks)
CPL @1095 (99.8%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 rout arg1" "arg2 and the Trail arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 acquired him from arg1" "arg2 romped over arg1" "arg2 blew out arg1" "arg2 beat the Trail arg1" ] using (knicks, blazers)
CPL @1116 (98.4%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 defeated the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (los_angeles_lakers, blazers)
CPL @1097 (98.4%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 would beat arg1" "arg2 just beat arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 match up well with arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 have beaten arg1" ] using (lakers, blazers)
CPL @1116 (98.4%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 defeated the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, los_angeles_lakers)
CPL @1097 (98.4%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg2 would beat arg1" "arg2 just beat arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 match up well with arg1" "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 have beaten arg1" ] using (blazers, lakers)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, memphis_grizzlies)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" ] using (memphis_grizzlies, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 defeated the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, oklahoma_city_thunder)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 defeated the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (oklahoma_city_thunder, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at Portland Trail arg1" ] using (sacramento_kings, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, sacramento_kings)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 or the San Antonio arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" "arg1 defeated the Texas arg2" "arg1 match up well against arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" ] using (blazers, spurs)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg1 or the San Antonio arg2" "arg1 beat arg2" "arg1 defeated the Texas arg2" "arg1 match up well against arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" ] using (spurs, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, san_antonio_spurs)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" ] using (san_antonio_spurs, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (phoenix_suns, blazers)
CPL @1116 (96.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 at the Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, phoenix_suns)
CPL @1096 (99.6%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 have beaten arg1" "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Trail arg1" "arg2 also lost to arg1" "arg2 outscored arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 have outscored arg1" ] using (blazers, suns)
CPL @1096 (99.6%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 have beaten arg1" "arg2 lose to arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and the Trail arg1" "arg2 also lost to arg1" "arg2 outscored arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 have outscored arg1" ] using (suns, blazers)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" ] using (minnesota_timberwolves, blazers)
CPL @1109 (87.5%) on 12-jun-2018 [ "arg1 lose to arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" "arg1 should beat arg2" ] using (blazers, timberwolves)
CPL @1109 (87.5%) on 12-jun-2018 [ "arg1 lose to arg2" "arg1 outscored arg2" "arg1 should beat arg2" ] using (timberwolves, blazers)
CPL @1116 (93.8%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 vs Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 v Portland Trail arg1" ] using (blazers, minnesota_timberwolves)
CPL @1100 (98.4%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 coach arg1" "arg2 head coach arg1" "arg2 because coach arg1" "arg2 have fired head coach arg1" "arg2 and head coach arg1" "arg2 fired head coach arg1" ] using (nate_mcmillan, blazers)
CPL @1116 (99.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 beat the Trail arg1" "arg2 outplayed arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 rally past arg1" "arg2 outrebounded arg1" "arg2 knocked off arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 have a better record than arg1" "arg2 outscored arg1" ] using (blazers, clippers)
CPL @1116 (99.9%) on 06-sep-2018 [ "arg2 beat the Trail arg1" "arg2 outplayed arg1" "arg2 and the Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 and Portland Trail arg1" "arg2 rally past arg1" "arg2 outrebounded arg1" "arg2 knocked off arg1" "arg2 beat arg1" "arg2 have a better record than arg1" "arg2 outscored arg1" ] using (clippers, blazers)
CPL @1098 (93.8%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 traded him to arg1" "arg2 lost to the Houston arg1" "arg2 actually outscored arg1" ] using (rockets, blazers)
CPL @1098 (93.8%) on 21-jan-2018 [ "arg2 lost to arg1" "arg2 traded him to arg1" "arg2 lost to the Houston arg1" "arg2 actually outscored arg1" ] using (blazers, rockets)