CPL @1115 (77.2%) on 26-aug-2018 [ "petition was filed with _" "we affirm _" "Sierra Club sued _" "industry urged _" "_ is seeking public comments" "initiative is funded by _" "Congress told _" "public land administered by _" "_ is the federal agency" "governmental agencies like _" "new rules issued by _" "_ issued a Record" "_ has approved for" "program is funded by _" "_ denied this request" "_ requested public comment" "_ gave final approval" "Federal agencies such as _" "public land managed by _" "Other federal agencies , such as _" "_ 's own reports" "Court affirmed _" "organizations recognized by _" "fines imposed by _" "study funded by _" "final decisions of _" "federal government agencies such as _" "_ 's regional administrator" "grant funds from _" "_ is accepting comment" "_ is inviting public comment" "Act suit against _" "_ 's inspection program" "_ 's Advance Notice" "_ did not err" "_ has conducted an investigation" "_ has considered these comments" "_ ordered the company" "Comments are due to _" "performance standards developed by _" "Obama administration asked _" "federal agencies , such as _" "grant award from _" "comments urged _" "agencies , in particular _" "_ 's findings" "Application filed with _" "Historic Places by _" "grants from _" "_ reasoned in" "groups asked _" "groups are urging _" "_ extend the comment period" "Funding was provided by _" "_ 's Proposed" "public lands managed by _" "Council sued _" "_ 's new rule" "programs are funded by _" "_ asked the Institute" "public affairs specialist with _" "matter is remanded to _" "_ received no comments" "_ issued new guidance" "federal agencies like _" "other federal agencies , including _" "federal agencies such as _" "_ is the federal agency responsible" "applications have been filed with _" "state agencies such as _" "government agencies like _" "lands managed by _" "coalition asked _" "case was investigated by _" "affairs specialist with _" "_ 's final rule" "_ 's own experts" "_ ruled on" "_ has exclusive jurisdiction" "_ is requiring the company" "decisions issued by _" "federal agencies , including _" "partnership program between _" "_ is proposing amendments" "_ extended the comment period" "_ rejected the application" "_ did not have authority" "joint program sponsored by _" "various agencies , including _" "_ entered a decree" "_ received an application" "_ invites written comments" "_ retains discretion" "outside agencies , such as _" "public lands administered by _" "approval from _" "_ has jurisdiction" "_ did not base" "_ had jurisdiction" "generous funding from _" "_ 's finding" "documents filed with _" "government entities such as _" "field office of _" "_ has broad discretion" "several government agencies including _" "regulations implemented by _" "group , sued _" "grant from _" "_ is not the only federal agency" "study was funded by _" "court vacated _" "_ is alerting the public" "numerous federal agencies including _" "Club sued _" "White House ordered _" "_ 's holding" "_ 's earlier decisions" "_ 's jurisdiction" "public affairs officer with _" "_ has regulatory authority" "_ 's approval process" "_ approved over" "project grants from _" "_ 's denial" "Federal agencies like _" "_ is seeking comment" "jurisdiction of _" "_ received several comments" "_ has long taken the position" "_ seeks comment" "_ 's own Office" "_ 's current interpretation" "Congress has told _" "_ 's factual findings" "_ ruled against" "affairs officer with _" "_ erred in" "_ issued an advisory" "appeal is filed with _" "applications pending at _" "_ 's field office" "_ issued a decision" "rule proposed by _" "cooperative agreement with _" "federal agency such as _" "Act did not give _" "comments asked _" "study , funded by _" "_ has no discretion" "_ is reviewing an application" "Places by _" "federal judge on _" "exclusive jurisdiction of _" "_ does not have jurisdiction" "_ released new guidelines" "comments were submitted to _" "government agencies such as _" "_ urging the agency" "application has been submitted to _" "_ 's regional headquarters" "group sued _" "false statements to _" "_ 's Buffalo office" "_ makes a determination" "_ is taking public comment" "_ 's draft guidance" "_ had ruled in" "hearing before _" "_ held hearings" "political interference at _" "Federal agencies , such as _" "_ 's Chief Information Officer" "national agencies like _" "_ is accepting public comments" "_ have jurisdiction" "Defense Council sued _" "federal entities such as _" "_ proposed a rule" "Congress has directed _" "investigation is being conducted by _" "land managed by _" "federal government , through _" "filing with _" "We commend _" "_ announced a new rule" "_ had the discretion" "_ is taking public comments" "_ placed a moratorium" "penalties imposed by _" "_ had discretion" "court agreed with _" "Appeals upheld _" "_ have no jurisdiction" "_ ruled in" "commenter urged _" "_ 's public comment period" "act directs _" "environmental groups sued _" "_ 's own scientists" "courts , such as _" "government agency such as _" "_ 's ruling" "risk assessment conducted by _" "land administered by _" "_ 's final action" "_ rejected a petition" "_ has no jurisdiction" ] using blm
CPL @1103 (96.9%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 lands and private arg1" "arg2 owns much of arg1" "arg2 manages more arg1" "arg2 and national forest arg1" "arg2 land and private arg1" ] using (land, blm)
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
CPL @1103 (96.9%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg2 lands and private arg1" "arg2 owns much of arg1" "arg2 manages more arg1" "arg2 and national forest arg1" "arg2 land and private arg1" ] using (land, blm)