CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (times, good_times)
CPL @1094 (93.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and in the bad arg2" "arg1 and we all have good arg2" "arg1 and in the worst of arg2" "arg1 and the worst of arg2" ] using (good_times, times)