CPL @1113 (81.6%) on 02-aug-2018 [ "campaign director for _" "policy analyst at _" "campaign director of _" "pressure groups such as _" "Policy Analyst at _" "policy analyst of _" "campaign director at _" "campaign manager of _" "political director of _" ] using taxpayers
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1095 (99.6%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg1 will be worse off as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered loss as arg2" "arg1 are suffering as arg2" "arg1 will be better off as arg2" "arg1 who are suffering as arg2" "arg1 who have suffered losses as arg2" "arg1 incurred as arg2" "arg1 who suffered losses as arg2" ] using (taxpayers, result)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)
CPL @1094 (98.4%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg2 House said arg1" "arg2 House claims that arg1" "arg2 House insists that arg1" "arg2 House and arg1" "arg2 House wants arg1" "arg2 House maintains that arg1" ] using (taxpayers, white)