gemma (person)

literal strings: gemma, Gemma

Help NELL Learn!

NELL wants to know if these beliefs are correct.
If they are or ever were, click thumbs-up. Otherwise, click thumbs-down.

• gemma has spouse dante (person)     
• gemma has spouse dante (person)     

categories

NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey

• person
• MBL @1116 (93.8%) on 12-sep-2018 [ Promotion of person:dante hasspouse model:gemma ] using concept:person:dante
• MBL @1116 (93.8%) on 12-sep-2018 [ Promotion of model:gemma hasspouse person:dante ] using concept:model:gemma
• model
• SEAL @304 (50.0%) on 18-jun-2011 [ 1 ] using gemma

relations

• hasspouse
• dante (person) (93.8%)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• dante (person) (93.8%)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)

NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey

• hasspouse
• steve_jobs (ceo)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• nick001
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (nick, gemma)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (gemma, nick)
• steve_jobs (personus)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• jobs (politicianus)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• jobs (professor)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• agentcollaborateswithagent
• today
• CPL @1113 (50.0%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg1 newsman arg2" ] using (today, gemma)
• CPL @1113 (50.0%) on 03-aug-2018 [ "arg1 newsman arg2" ] using (gemma, today)
• hasspouse
• steve (agent)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• dante (architect)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• jobs (building)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• dante (comedian)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• dante (director)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• steve (museum)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• nick (person)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (nick, gemma)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (gemma, nick)
• nick (person)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (nick, gemma)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (gemma, nick)
• steve (person)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• steve (person)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• steve001
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (steve, gemma)
• CPL @1103 (50.0%) on 06-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and her partner arg2" ] using (gemma, steve)
• nick (physicalaction)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (nick, gemma)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (gemma, nick)
• dante (televisionshow)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• dante (visualizableattribute)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (gemma, dante)
• CPL @1100 (75.0%) on 31-jan-2018 [ "arg2 was promised in marriage to arg1" "arg2 was betrothed to arg1" ] using (dante, gemma)
• nick (website)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (nick, gemma)
• CPL @1097 (50.0%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 and her boyfriend arg2" ] using (gemma, nick)
• wifeof
• henry001
• CPL @1104 (87.5%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and his wife arg2" "arg1 cheated on arg2" "arg1 was cheating on arg2" ] using (henry, gemma)
• henry002
• CPL @1104 (87.5%) on 18-mar-2018 [ "arg1 and his wife arg2" "arg1 cheated on arg2" "arg1 was cheating on arg2" ] using (henry, gemma)