CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are professionally qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" "arg2 are all highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly experienced arg1" "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly skilled arg1" ] using (linguists, translators)
CPL @1094 (99.8%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 are professionally qualified arg2" "arg1 are highly trained arg2" "arg1 are experienced arg2" "arg1 are all highly qualified arg2" "arg1 are qualified arg2" "arg1 are certified arg2" "arg1 are highly experienced arg2" "arg1 are highly qualified arg2" "arg1 are highly skilled arg2" ] using (translators, linguists)
CPL @1094 (96.9%) on 01-jan-2018 [ "arg1 are qualified arg2" "arg1 are experienced arg2" "arg1 and skilled arg2" "arg1 are all experienced arg2" "arg1 are trained arg2" ] using (project_managers, linguists)
CPL @1097 (93.8%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 is made up of experienced arg2" "arg1 are highly qualified arg2" "arg1 are all qualified arg2" "arg1 are highly trained arg2" ] using (staff, linguists)
NELL has only weak evidence for items listed in grey
CPL @1097 (87.5%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 who are not only arg2" "arg1 are subject matter arg2" "arg1 and subject matter arg2" ] using (linguists, experts)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are professionally qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" "arg2 are all highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly experienced arg1" "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly skilled arg1" ] using (linguists, translators)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1097 (87.5%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 who are not only arg2" "arg1 are subject matter arg2" "arg1 and subject matter arg2" ] using (linguists, experts)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1095 (98.4%) on 17-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are professionally qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" "arg2 are all highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly experienced arg1" "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly skilled arg1" ] using (linguists, translators)
CPL @1097 (87.5%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 are trained arg2" "arg1 and other skilled arg2" "arg1 are fully qualified and experienced arg2" ] using (linguists, professionals)
CPL @1097 (87.5%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 who are not only arg2" "arg1 are subject matter arg2" "arg1 and subject matter arg2" ] using (linguists, experts)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1097 (87.5%) on 19-jan-2018 [ "arg1 who are not only arg2" "arg1 are subject matter arg2" "arg1 and subject matter arg2" ] using (linguists, experts)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)
CPL @1096 (87.5%) on 18-jan-2018 [ "arg2 are highly qualified arg1" "arg2 are all qualified arg1" "arg2 are highly trained arg1" ] using (linguists, staff)